Members of Opposition Parties in Singapore are Crazy

Some of the themes in online comments against the opposition candidates is that they are crazy people. They must be mentally unsound, stricken with serious cases of megalomania. They have a messiah complex. That must be the reason why they want to be MPs. Because they want the fame, the glory. They want all of us to bow down, kiss their feet and worship the very ground they walk upon. Why else would they want to contest? Why else would they want to stand against the PAP?

I too, think that opposition candidates are crazy. Just not in the ways those online commentators think.

I think most opposition candidates truly want to speak up for certain segments of Singaporeans that could be marginalized. I believe that most opposition candidates truly believe in the cause of having more alternative views represented in parliament. In the way that they try to advance this cause, they may come across as megalomaniacal.

But unless there is firm evidence to show otherwise, I believe that most of the opposition members firmly stand by their conviction that having opposition MPs is in the best long-term interests of Singapore. In fact, so firm is their conviction that the opposition candidates have stood up, put themselves out there to be judged, to be ridiculed, to be scrutinized.

Yes, unless there is evidence to show otherwise, I believe that most of the opposition candidates DID NOT decide to run in general elections because they want “fame” or “glory. Yes. That includes Dr Chee Soon Juan too.

Chee soon Juan

Dr Chee Soon Juan at rally speech. Photo from Yahoo News

So why do I think that opposition candidates are crazy?

Because of what they are giving up for their conviction.

By PM Lee’s own admission, even the PAP finds it difficult to find candidates. He said in an interview earlier in 2015: “If you ask an ordinary Singaporean whether he is willing to join politics, he may say, this is so troublesome, as it involves not only me, but also my family and my children. Do I really need to do this? They may not tell me directly and give me this answer, but I think this consideration is clearly in their minds. So they will tell me, “Oh, how about next time, or I think I do not have the political cells; I do not have the natural oratorical ability; So it is better for you to find another person more suited for this responsibility.” I can find some candidates, but it is much more difficult than before to find a complete line-up.”

And this is the PAP we are talking about. Even with its monolithic party machinery, with the support from its private, people and public sector networks, with a friendly mainstream media, people still think twice (or thrice, or… you get the idea) about joining PAP because they are concerned about the great cost to them.

Never mind the potential rewards. Never mind that you will have swarms of people hovering around you trying to be your best friend after you become a PAP MP. Never mind the possibility that companies may suddenly approach you to be on their Board of Directors, paying you large sums of money to attend occasional meetings. The cost is still considerably high enough to deter people from joining PAP as candidates.

What more the opposition parties? Joining as an opposition candidate would be like being thrown to the wolves. You are suddenly pariah amongst your friends. Your loved ones keep reminding you how stupid they think you are for joining the opposition parties.

Also, rumour has it that the moment you have anything to do with the opposition parties, you can forget about getting any job in the civil service. If you run a company, you can forget about getting any government contracts. And unless you have a part in starting the company, you can forget about any companies asking you to be on their Board of Directors. Or so the rumours go.

Worse. You have to contend with an extremely biased mainstream media. A mainstream media who would dump all journalistic standards down the gutter and pass unsubstantiated rumours against you as breaking news. Like what happened to Dr Daniel Goh. One small misstep and your name will be trawled through mud incessantly.

No, don’t you dare start the “oh but you can give your buddies contracts. See AHPETC” thing. Even if there was cronyism involved, how did that benefit the WP MPs directly? Unless there is any evidence that their actions benefited the WP MPs in tangible ways, shut up about it.

And have you seen the sort of conditions the WP MPs work in? Instead of nice air-conditioned premises to hold their MPS, they hold theirs in void decks. Even when the PSI has hit 200+, they soldier on! Oh. And let’s not forget how politicised PA is.

WP MPS on Monday after GE2015. Photo from He Ting Ru's Facebook page

WP MPS on Monday after GE2015. Photo from He Ting Ru’s Facebook page

So why do I think opposition members are crazy?

Because they persevere even when the chips are stacked against them. Because they push on even when all hope seems lost. Because they stand by their convictions even when people doubt them. Because they keep coming back defeat after defeat, hammering after hammering.

And they do all these even when Singaporeans do not appreciate the crucial role they play.

When things were going so wrong and Singaporeans’ anger so palpable that PM Lee apologized during the lunchtime rally of GE2011, Singaporeans used WP to pile the pressure on PAP to change. Say what you will… but if indeed there were plans all along to move the centre of gravity of the cabinet left of centre, then why did PM have to apologise in GE2011? That, to me, is the surest indication that the results of GE2011 and the presence of 6 more WP MPs really caused the seismic shifts in philosophy of policy making of the PAP.

Yet, now that things are heading in the right direction, and things seem to be improving, we are so quick to withdraw our support from WP as if they did nothing for us whatsoever.

There is a Chinese saying: “鸟尽弓藏 ,兔死狗烹”. The literal translation of it is “when the birds are all shot, you hide the bow. When the hares have all been hunted, you cook the hunting dog.” And that is exactly what we are doing to WP. We think we no longer need them, and so we kick them aside.

We want to have our cake and eat it. We want the stability of having the PAP as the government. And we take for granted that the opposition will continue to get candidates of fairly good caliber (I think most people will agree that He Ting Ru, Daniel Goh, Leon Perera, Paul Tambyah are candidates of high caliber) to run in subsequent GEs and allow us to dial up the pressure on the PAP should things go south again (as I am sure they will at some point it time). But… why should they? Especially when Singaporeans seem so ungrateful and are taking them for granted?

Yet… It seems that they might still stay on.

He Ting Ru and Dennis Tan at WP's MPS on Monday after GE2015. Photo from He Ting Ru's Facebook page

He Ting Ru and Dennis Tan at WP’s MPS on Monday after GE2015. Photo from He Ting Ru’s Facebook page

And that is why I think they are crazy. They are doing a thankless job. They are sacrificing so much with little or no hope of any reward whatsoever. I don’t know why they are doing it. I don’t know what motivates them. But I, for one, am thankful that they are soldiering on. They give me reason to continue to believe, reason to continue to hope.

Thank you, you crazy, amazing people.

[See also: Why WP are like dogs]


6 thoughts on “Members of Opposition Parties in Singapore are Crazy

  1. Paul Tambyah has a Phd but after what he suggested in a debate with Minister for Foreign Affairs and Minister for Law, Mr K Shanmugam I wonder how he got his Phd.

    He suggested that we should hold a referendum for defence procurement. How can the ordinary citizen decide whether a defence procurement is good? Google? Only defence analyst can comment on a procurement. He stated that Switzerland can do it why can’t we. Switzerland wants to do it is their own problem and besides Switzerland is neutral, we are not.


    • I have three things in response to your comment:

      1. In what ways are we not neutral? Whose side are we on? The Americans? The Chinese? The Indians? The Indonesians? The Malaysians? Whose side are we actually on if we are not neutral? Singapore is part of the non-aligned movement. So I think it is only correct to say that Singapore IS very neutral. We are on nobody’s side except our own.

      2. What evidence do you have to back up your claim that only defence analysts can comment on defence procurements? Or are you saying that Singaporeans not well-educated enough to be able to understand the issues around defence procurements? Are you implying that we not have the mental faculties required to analyse defence procurements? Are you suggesting that we all so stupid that we cannot make an informed decision about defence procurements?

      3. Just because he may have said something you disagree with doesn’t mean that Prof Paul Tambyah does not deserve the salutation of Dr or Prof. His field is in medicine. To be more precise, he is an expert in infectious diseases. He got his medical degree and tenure as full professor from NUS. NUS is ranked as the top university in Asia and 12th in the world. To question how Prof Paul Tambyah got his medical degree and full tenure is questioning the integrity and professional judgement of the professors in NUS. Also, Prof Paul Tambyah has won numerous awards for his contribution both as a practising doctor, a researcher and a teacher. His CV is here:

      Are you saying that you know better than the professors in NUS medical school in judging whether a person is fit to be a doctor or deserving of a full tenure as a professor in NUS Medical School? Are you saying that you are able to judge that he doesn’t deserve all those accolades in his field as a medical doctor and professor (as a researcher and teacher) just by the few minutes you saw him on TV? On what authority?


    • Why not a referendum? Are you implying Singaporeans are daft? They are unable to comprehend issues? I kinda feel insulted now cos you have implied that i am too daft to understand issues which affect me.

      By the way, SDP’s proposal was to cut defence spending. PAP’s argument has always been that Singapore is in between two muslim countries, and should they join forces, they easily can overcome us. Much like how Israel’s situation in the middle east. This is not only a simplistic argument but negates the peculiar factors leading to the creation of Israel. Indonesia and Malaysia are not friends. And should either of them feel a need to overcome Singapore, they would do it by hitting us where it hurts. Our economy. Just think of the time when Indonesia banned the import of their local sand to Singapore.

      By the way, i think this is the mindset of the electorate. LAZY. They don’t bother to read, they want to be spoon fed. Further to that, they don’t analyse. Your comment exemplifies this mentality. Why should i think of how the budget is allocated for defence? And true to form, the PAP know their audience.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I agree on the part about laziness. But I have hope that we are slowly changing. Do help us change, so that in time to come, we can move closer to the ideal government of the people, government for the people, by the people. Oh… and, if you do like this blog, please follow it! Thanks much!


  2. Singapore is not neutral as i think that we are trying to support everyone and get support back from everyone. Neutral is not even supporting anyone. We’re in ASEAN, we’re supporting AEC, TPP…so definitely not neutral.

    For the swiss referendum, they’re unique, they’re used to referendums, even citizens can call for referendums on their own. Lawmakers are used to coming up with laws that are robustly debated, with views taken in on all sides, even alternative ones. No one wants to come up with a law that can be easily overturned by a referendum. Can’t see that happening in Singapore, could you?


    • Hi Evernal, thanks for reading the blog and leaving a comment.

      I think that the reality of international diplomacy is that there is no way we can possibly support everyone. If Singapore does that, Singapore will end up pissing everyone off. Speak to any MFA staff and they will tell you that. While we may be part of many different international organisations (ASEAN), pushing for various things to happen (e.g. TPP), we really do not take the sides of any nation. Also, membership of international organisation (e.g. ASEAN) doesn’t mean that we are not neutral. If that is the case, then even Switzerland isn’t neutral cos Switzerland is a member of UN.

      And about the swiss being unique… well… Mr Goh Chok Tong did aspire for Singapore to reach the Swiss standard of living. While you may be right that Singapore is now far from that aspiration in many ways, including more active participation in law and policy making, I believe that it is worth our while to keep working towards that ideal. And as part of the effort is for ordinary citizens to discuss issues openly and rationally even amongst ourselves. And I hope that I will live to see the day where we truly reach the Swiss standard of living and active participation in law and policy making.

      Once again,thank you for dropping by. Hope to hear your views more often. Please follow my blog or like my Facebook page for more updates. Thanks!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s